If you are looking for any budget Android phones, then there are chances that you might be thinking of buying a Moto G8. It is one of the best budget smartphones that you can buy right now, but recently Nokia has also introduced it’s budget Android smartphones, Nokia 5.3.
The blog will work as the guide that will help you to choose the best one among these two budget smartphones.
Design And Look
Nokia – 164.3 x 76.6 x 8.5mm and 185 grams
Moto – 161.3 x 75.8 x 9mm and 188.3 grams
All the phones in the market don’t have metal and glass bodies, and these two smartphones are made from plastic rear panels and frames. Moto has the glossy plastic, and Nokia has a matte finished look.
The matte finish in the Nokia looks excellent in hand, and the thinness of the phone enhances its look. The thinner edges and curves of the Moto G8 make it more comfortable to hold your phone.
In terms of buttons and ports, both the phones share similar features. Both the phones have a fingerprint sensor on the back, but the sensor of the Moto is more reliable and responsive. Both the phones have an identical display, but the Moto has a unique cut out for the selfie camera. Nokia excels with the small dewdrop style notch screen.
What About Display?
Nokia – 6.55-inch LCD panel with the 720 x 1600 resolution
Moto – 6.4-inch LCD panel with the 720 x 1560 resolution
Both the models have the 720-pixel display and 268 PPI pixel density. You will get the same sharpness in both the models, but you might have a better content viewing experience on Nokia’s phone. You can expect these features in most of the smartphones.
The main difference in both the smartphone is the way both the phone process colors while working. Moto’s phone is more vibrant than the Nokia 5.3. The Moto has set a default feature of having the white background behind the app icons and menu bar, which allows you to see them clearly.
Let’s Talk About The Performance and hardware
Nokia – 3GB, 4GB or 6GB RAM
Moto – 4GB RAM
Both the smartphones run on the same Snapdragon Qualcomm processor, and both devices work well in all their variants. Sometimes, you might need to wait for two to three seconds for loading any app, if you are using it with other apps in the Nokia 5.3. Even you will find some shuttering animation while scrolling and playing games. It is expected that the company might do some cost-cutting by providing low resolution and low graphics in terms of sharpness and frame rates. Nokia phones have higher frame dropping and stuttering issues as compared to the Moto.
If you want to play games like Asphalt 9, then the Moto phone is more suitable. You can play your game smoothly.
Both the smartphones are on the same platforms in terms of loading applications and the interface. The battery life of both the phones are trustworthy as they offer a 4,000mAh battery life that can keep your phone running for the whole day with the low-resolution display. If you don’t use your phone more frequently, then you can use your phone for at least two days in a single charge.
Software
One thing is purely great in both the devices as both phones run on relatively pure Android versions. Both phones have updated Android 10 software, which is a quite decent deal, but Nokia has the benefit of being part of the Android One program.
Simply, it means when Google releases any security patch every month, the Nokia users will get them quickly. Nokia is promising that they will provide the same software update for at least two years. It is one of the best budget smartphones which touches the Google Pixel in terms of software.
Cameras Are Very Important
Nokia Has The
- 5MP ultra-wide
- 2MP macro and depth sensors
- Quad camera system
- 13MP f/1.8 primary
Moto Has The
- 2MP macro
- 8MP f/2.2 ultra-wide
- Triple camera system
- 16MP f/1.7 primary
Apart from the hardware specs, they have relatively similar camera makeups but with different technical specs. All the cameras of the Moto have a higher resolution sensor than Nokia’s smartphone.
If you test the processed image of these smartphones, you can understand the real difference between them. You might find that Nokia’s phone produces a picture with a narrower field of view and richer and deeper color images. These things make the camera of Nokia better than Moto.
But when it comes to video shooting mode, Moto can shoot the video at 4K resolution, and Nokia can’t do it.
Bottomline
Both smartphones are quite identical. But Moto is the model that can deliver smoother performance and also has better display quality. The design of the Moto G8 is better than Nokia’s Phone.
But Nokia’s slimmer design and matte finish make it a stylish smartphone, and being the part of the Android One program makes it a better deal at a lower price. But overall, Moto is the all-round package, and if you want to save some bucks, then Nokia will work well.
No comments:
Post a Comment